X News Now

A UFO spotted somewhere in USA in early 2009…

The main topic of discussion on the web nowdays is the UFO, which was sighted over the Chinese Airport. This has become a hot topic and now is a point of concern for many countries in the world. The video which has been published all over the internet, shows an object which is standing at an elevated height at the Airport. Komaram Puli Trailer

June 29th night session with more than 5 units at the same time, I was kept busy, here are some three together at first before they split up, one staying the others returning later. One posed as a star for over 30 minutes watching my session with the others before joining in eventually with a red flare-up and a slow pass by. More postings of the unrecognised entities that reside as our neighbours…

An Italian member of the European Parliament, Mario Borghezio, got his name in the papers and on the Internet, when he publicly called for Europe to make its own archives of “close encounters of the third kind.”

…

Read Full Post

What happens when a person has consistent UFO sightings and videos them? What happens when that person tries to place up what they saw on You Tube? Does the tyranny of skepticism come into play and will he be attacked on all sides? Finally, what happens when that someone questions others to come see and film what he sees?

Well, the answer to the last question is, not one UFO organization did anything.

Why, because we all know this UFO You Tube stuff is all BS, right? You Tube videos seem to get UFOs organizational attention when they are attached to a larger tale or when they are sensationalized. I guess the thinking goes: Most individuals are guilty of hoaxes and not worthy of examination. This has got to change. You Tube is a wonderful UFO resource. Videos on You Tube can be tracked down and analyzed and most of the excellent ones are videoed by individuals who care rather than hoax.

I came across Kevin McCracken clips on his You Tube channel here:

http://www.youtube.com/user/kevinmc360

Kevin filmed these objects, over and over, which seem to form a triangle but are really distinct, separate objects. These light objects are very impressive to me and deserved further study. Kevin had questioned for help only a one person answered. You will hear about him in his response to the attack campaign.

I questioned Kevin to send me a copy of the original and he kindly agreed. What was very weird in the first clip, other than the objects being weird in themselves, is the part where they go behind a cloud and seemingly stop dead. I know some will say they were hidden by the cloud cover, but I looked over this clip time and time again. There does seem to be some black sky right in the place where these series of light objects should come out. Some of them would have been seen. It is by no way conclusive; but not to be dismissed so lightly. A further study of these objects in the video, has indicated to me that these lights are the objects and are not attached to some larger craft. I took the two clips into an editing program and tried to find one instance where the stars dimmed when they happened to pass in between the lights. Although there was some distortion from bringing the objects so close, I could not find one instance where any of the stars dimmed. This could indicate there were no protruding wings of structures on the sides of these light objects. As far as seeing geese wings, as you can see in the slowed down version (1/4 speed) the only dimming of the lights are caused by clouds or movement of the scope by Kevin. Kevin, as have many other multiple UFO witnesses, was lambasted by the usual bottom feeder skeptics on You Tube the minute he place his experience up. As so often is the case, the emotions these tyrannical skeptics produce on UFO witnesses are not fun. I felt Kevin should have his complete say.

Kevin McCracken 408-839-0578- Oakland California

“I have seen these craft on five separate Friday nights at 10:00 PM. You will have to call me a liar at this point in order for the geese theory to glide. I invite anyone who is serious. To sit with me, just bring your own night vision and video camera. Phone and contact info is at the bottom. You need some skin in the game if you want to participate. Since when do geese or any other animal in the natural world besides man show up at the same time at the same coordinates flying in the same direction like military clockwork? For all you geese chasers please answer we all want to hear your explanation for that. This example reminds me of the North Vietnamese SAM squads commenting that they could set their watches to the American bombing runs. No need to stay at the SAM all day just be ready ten minutes before the scheduled bombing run. This adhered to schedule demonstrates human behavior, creatures of habit and prisoners of time, a construct of man. It also demonstrates an arrogance of the un-touchable.


. These geese chasers bet their whole argument on flapping goose wings. They state you can clearly see them when the tape is slowed down to 25% speed. Geese flap their wings at 2.6 beats per second. That speed is easily recognizable at 30 FPS. If these were geese you could clearly see these geese beating their wings without the aid of modern film editing tools. See the many infrared examples on YOUTUBE of birds in flight. My video’s 05-28-2010 and 06-11-2010 look nothing like the other infrared video’s of birds flying. One geese chaser states that the infrared we observe on the video is stray light being reflected off the soft goose down under bellies from the city lights of Oakland. What complete hog-wash. If you recall there was cloud cover on the night of 5-28-2010 at about 2500 feet over the location of the video recording. That means your geese are huge enough and bright enough to reflect not emit light similar to the satellite shown later in the video. Geese chasers with all do respect this is nothing more than fabrication and embellishment on your their part.
If you recall the 5 targets flew well over the cloud cover. Geese glide at between 40-70km/h max straight and level. The speed your geese were flying if at 1000 Meters above camera level was 82.5km/h based on the cloud cover seen in the video 40 degrees/16s.
reference for geese flying speed.


http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v101n02/p0342-p0348.pdf

Now if in fact these were geese at 1000 meters above the camera. With the camera set at an effective magnification of 6X. You would be able to clearly see geese with no second look, no need to slow it down to 25% or 7.5 FPS . Not to mention no sound from them; NO HONKING! I have 40 geese outside my office with chicks right now. They were quite a bit smaller on 5-28-2010. No way was that flock going to glide very high very far with chicks. Geese HONK when they glide. This is an integral part of their breathing and communication. So you might argue these geese must be much higher. That’s why you can barely see their wings flapping or even hear them. Well ok they are already flying quicker straight and level than recorded and studied by the fellow above. So how high are they flying? How about Another 1000 meters? We just double the speed of to 164 km/h an impossible speed. At some point geese chasers need to stop wasting my and every body’s time with the bird tales. We have the footage we can count the seconds ticked off on the video. We can see the stars in the background we can count the 40 degrees flown between the stars in 16 seconds to figure speed. No huge deal just solve for the triangle right. Yes or no geese chasers a simple nod will do. Aw shucks, I guess so they say. Next thing to do is calculate actual target size based on focal length spot diameter and estimated distance to target which I will do. Just not yet I am waiting for some information from the camera manufacturer. I might add that my preliminary calculations on object size verse camera focal length and image size are quite large and the altitude is very high. I will share the final results when I am sure of the accuracy. My initial reaction to these objects was Space Craft and after all the review of the footage frame by frame over and over. Not to mention 30 years in Aero Space engineering, Debating and taking the attacks from the likes of all the geese chasers, I am going to stay with my initial observation and statements on video and say Space Craft. I am not here to dis-info lie cheat, fake etc. It is very possible that these video’s and others like it are the smoking gun video tape evidence of electrogravitic Space Craft similar to the type talked about by PHD and Author Paul LaViolette.
Here is a few tid bits I found on the subject of electrogravitics read below:


“Retired Air Force Colonel Donald Ware has passed on to me information from a three-star general he knows who revealed to him in July that ‘the new Lockheed-Martin space shuttle (Space Plane) and the B-2 (stealth bomber) both have electrogravitic systems on board’ and that ‘this clarifies why our 21 Northrop B-2s cost about a billion dollars each.’ Thus, after taking off conventionally, the B-2 can switch to antigravity mode, and, I have heard, glide around the world without refueling.” – Dr. Richard Boylan, Sept. 22, 1997, Sacramento, CA
Antigravity Evolves from Electrogravitics and Subquantum Kinetics
Book Review by Thomas Valone, PhD, PE – Integrity Research Institute – 12/21/08
Starting with a detailed review of electrogravitics and the life of T. Townsend Brown, Dr.
Paul LaViolette’s book, Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion (Bear & Company, 2008)
offers a wonderfully informative description of the science of propulsion generators. Paul
tends to use the terms “antigravity” and “electrogravitics” quite liberally, even when
other terms might be more precise. But, the phenomena that is reviewed in his book,
such as the 2200 newton per kilowatt thrust generated by T.T. Brown’s best high voltage
discs in his report, “Electrohydrodynamics” are quite impressive. Also fascinating are the
details about Brown’s later life research into petrovoltaics that include graphs of the
spontaneous voltage (about 300 mV) developed continuously over a nine-day period.
Paul is careful to include corroboration when available, such as the Physical Review
paper by Dr. Elmer Harrington from the National Bureau of Standards that confirms
Brown’s effects on gravitational acceleration and heat generation in rocks.
Paul also includes probably the most scientific review of the Philadelphia Experiment in
print today along with the possibility that T.T. Brown participated in the event and how it
might have been orchestrated. He includes, for example, a summary of Jim and Ken
Corum’s experiments with high-amperage coils around a steel torus that produced a
fivefold reduction in radar reflection and a review of the Hutchison Effect. The evolution
of antigravity research into the black world is given plausible reality with the evidence
provided by several black ops interviews also in the book, as well as quotes from
engineering articles.
While the book returns periodically to T.T. Brown and the asymmetric capacitors that
gave the term “electrogravitics” its birth, the description of the Lafforgue patent
developing longitudinal thrust is an added intrigue. Many readers may be familiar with
Paul’s article on the electrogravitics properties of the B-2 bomber that used to be in my
book, Electrogravitics Systems, Reports on a New Propulsion Methodology, until it was
recalled for its inclusion in his new book. But, in Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion
a lot more detail is revealed making the B-2 electrification even more convincing. A
French astrophysicist proposes the visible luminosity of the craft as proof that it was
being excited by a high-voltage field. Even an online movie and color stills in possession
of Northrop Grumman are documented that provide evidence of the high voltage glow.
With information about an AC microwave excitation mode, LaViolette makes the case
for a 40,000 newton per kilowatt thrust with a million volt potential for the B-2 thrusters,
enough to clarify the rumored no-fuel flight around the world.
Probably the most exciting chapter for me was the Chapter 6 description of the
Podkletnov-Modanese electrogravitics impulse generator. It was reported in the Jane’s
Defense Weekly to knock over a set of books at one kilometer distance with a negligible
power loss even hundreds of kilometers away. Paul predicted from his subquantum
kinetic theory that the gravity impulse generator should have no recoil, which was then
confirmed by Professor Podkletnov. His description of the increased punch from a quicker
rise time Marx generator seems quite credible from my research into the electrokinetic
equation developed by Jefimenko, which has the same feature and the same polarity
toward the positive pole. But, Paul forgot to mention the most compelling civilian
application for the Podkletnov gravity impulse generator, which is for planetary
protection from killer near-earth-orbit (NEO) objects. Enough evidence is presented in
the book to show that such a generator can maintain a collimated and coherent force
beam for miles with enough pressure to perhaps nudge a large object away from a
collision course.
The book also includes a review of the historic Project Skyvault which is introduced by a
black ops informant, as the first source of information that Paul received about it. It
makes the case for an electrogravitics force developed from nonlinear materials exposed
to microwaves, as well as an fascinating description of phase conjugated mirror effects.
One example given is the FASER research performed by Obolensky in the author’s
presence over a period of two years which also included a runaway experiment that
exploded under resonant conditions.”


I started to research into the electrogravitics because the IR brightness seen in my video’s. Geese chasers will question “Just what could electromagnetism have to do with this topic they question”? Well everything my fine-feathered friends. Go back and read above.


Question:


What would emit a bright infrared signature besides heat? Answer microwave radiation. If you pull on the Paul LaViolette string you get a whole new perspective. I must thank other bloggers from Casebook who informed me about Paul.


In the future I will do another video with some changes for the better and hopefully answer more questions. When the next video comes out I am sure the various bird chasers will have more to say about Geese. But please all the doubters share with us all how these Space Craft electrogravitic craft or (geese) have been at the same place at the same time on 5 separate Friday nights? We are all waiting for the answer… Maybe to get to the other side they answer. Hmmmm….

Thanks, Kevin. We all read a fantastic deal about how UFO bloggers are nothing more than a un-informed nuisances. But it will be people who will solve this UFO phenomenon question: people like you, the reader, those at casebook, and Kevin. No longer is UFOs data and information in the hands of UFO researchers or the debunkers, now this data is supplied by savvy UFO experiencersrs for all to read and see.

By the way I have also included a clip from a rather recent night vision capture over the well-known Gilliland UFO Ranch.

UFO Media Matters

Non-Commercial Blog

U

UFO Ranch: Mt. Adams

Thanks to Original news poster.

Just as Hurricane Alex was passing through the Gulf of Mexico these weird red rings were caught on tape floating along the shore of western Florida. Gorgeous shot from camera on tripod, but what the heck are those things….

Could the well-known Roswell crash be a modern day Ancient Astronaut intervention?

Could alien beings have chose after the Second World War to leak some of their “primitive technology” to the United States to help us in the future? Many inside the UFO community believe in the Ancient Astronaut theory. That theory states that ETs were involve with ancient empires by helping them with their technology. They seemed to have presented themselves as sons of the Gods to the natives. Has this stopped? I fervently believe that in no way did the ETs give an anti-gravity machine to any ancient civilization. We find some claims by the ancients but a simpler answer is they were sowing their own brand of disinformation (scare the hell out of your enemies). I do believe, at that time, ETs helped these empires using technology, disguised as magic, and these ETs were in total control of these gadgets at all times. How could they do this today in our world and who would they pick? Would they present themselves as gods to a now technologically based society? I doubt it.

Why was the ship at Roswell left by the ETs to be learned? Considering all the length these entities go to so their right natures won’t be learned, why didn’t they know they had crashed? It seems obvious to me the recovered technology reported reflects a technology from our near future, not a distant one. Why were their bodies left to rot? Are you trying to tell me there are no intercommunications between these spacecraft?

There is a fantastic deal of unanswered questions around these crashes. I will deal with the Roswell case because that is the one I believe really happened. Something doesn’t make sense. We know that whoever or whatever is behind the UFO sightings does not want us to capture their craft. Anytime our planes tried to bring them down it was disastrous.

So here comes the Roswell crash, a smorgasbord of technology and alien bodies given to us on a silver platter to figure out. Yet we haven’t had a hint of alien intrusion to try and stop these supposedly disastrous blunders. We all know one technology that was retrieved at the Roswell site: pieces of the wreckage. The memory metal and I beams are not in dispute. What do you reckon about those pieces? Were they a thousand years in our future technological development, a hundred, fifty? At this time I believe we will have that technology in less than fifty years. It certainly doesn’t reflect the technology being witnessed and reported now, or even at that time.

Some may counter, “Well, Joe, don’t you remember there were dead aliens and a live one?” What did they do kill some of their own? First we have to question, was there a live alien at all? From the history of Roswell this tale has two sides. One side claims the ETs they saw were all dead. The other side; one was alive. If they were all dead. Remember we really don’t know how they died could the bodies have been a plant. Even if there was a ET that was alive many humans volunteer for very vital possible death missions and this would certainly have been one. We have to also consider the huge question- do they really die?

Why America you might question? If you believe ETs are spiritual and compassionate or even just practical then America was the country. The ETs monitored the war and knew we had developed the Atomic bomb. The stakes had changed and if they had bases they were in danger. The United States was a country whose population represented nearly all of the diverse cultures in our world. In those times America didn’t want war .We were horrified, as a nation, at the horrors the Germans had inflected on the Jews and other minorities. We were starting to grow up as a nation. We had a well informed citizenry to mould the country’s future. America was the bright star of freedom for the future. In the past it seemed ETs pick Empires on the brink of greatness America may have been another example of this.

Recently Tony Bragilia presented yet another example of a witness to the crash of a spaceship in Roswell. I would say a very high percentage of UFO skeptical researchers and people in the UFO community have come to the conclusion that the explanation of what happened at Roswell can only be defined now as an ET Spaceship.

http://ufocon.blogspot.com/2010/06/military-base-firemen-claim-we.html

Kevin Randle now admits the most probable explanation for Roswell is a crashed ET craft. Randle, in his new book, also gave credit to Don Schmitt’s continuing research even though they had a parting of the ways. I feel that is a excellent deed and helps in getting at the whole truth. I wrote an article on Schmitt and Kevin’s parting of the ways here:

http://ufomedia.blogspot.com/2007/11/unforgiving-redeemed.html

Below are the clips from the Lieutenant Colonel

Philip J. Corso interview, but here I want to chide S. Friedman on his thoughts about Corso. First he was head of the foreign technology unit, for Stanton to compare his clearance and they way it was handled with Corso’s and his insider clearence is ridiculous. Second, the thought that this man would ruin his credibility, in the majority of the public’s eye for a book sale should be unthinkable considering what he was involved in trying to bring our boys home. Isn’t it more likely that his book “The Day After Roswell” was half truths used to leak some information to the public, as a safety net for his family, along with disinformation aimed toward our enemies? Anyone with his knowledge and expertise would know easily how to do that. I feel Stanton has dismissed Corso to easily without truly understanding the implications for anyone who would leak verifiable smoking gun information on a secret “higher than the H-Bomb”; Roswell. Many agree within the UFO community that in the 1990s some in the government wanted the truth out. How could you do that without being in real distress? Maybe Corso found a way.

So if the UFO community can stop arguing over whether the Roswell crash was an ET, then we can start to discuss how a civilization as advanced as what we are continuing to witnesses could have ships that crash at all.

Joseph Capp

UFO Media Matters

Thanks to Original news poster.

REUPLOAD Check My Channel For Playlist See Also Video Response I KNOW WHAT I SAW’ is a documentary guaranteed to change the way we see the universe. Director James Fox assembled the most credible UFO witnesses from around the world to testify at The National Press Club in Washington DC including Air Force generals, astronauts, military and commercial pilots, government and FAA offi…

hindustantimes – A bright spiralling light, believed by astronomers to be a rocket launched from Cape Canaveral, was spotted in skies across Australia’s east coast just before dawn on Saturday, sparking a UFO frenzy.

Described by some witnesses as a “lollipop-type swirl”, the cloud of light was seen over the country’s three easternmost provinces – New South Wales, Queensland and the Australian Capital Territory – shortly before sunrise.

“It had a distinct bright centre, much like a bright star … (with) trails spiralling and fattening out from it,” Canberra resident James Butcher told broadcaster ABC of the spectacle, which he said lasted two or three minutes.

Other witnesses likened the spectacular phenomenon, footage of which was quick to hit the Internet, to a “huge revolving moon” with a swirl in the middle, or an illuminated cloud moving high and quick above the horizon.

“It certainly had that lollipop-type swirl … but it was travelling low and honestly quick, and as it went past me and I looked up, it looked like a row of lights, maybe four lights,” one Brisbane resident said.

Astronomer Andrew Jacob, acting curator of the Sydney Observatory, said it was most likely SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket, launched Friday from Cape Canaveral shortly before dawn broke over Australia.

“It fits best, a rocket travelling overhead with something venting out of it, fuel venting out of the motor,” Jacob said.

“The rocket’s probably tumbling or spinning a small which makes a spiral effect, a small like water coming out of a hose when you spin it. That’s the best explanation I have so far, probably the most likely one.”

The light was travelling the incorrect way for it to be an astronomical phenomenon, and Jacob said he had ruled out other possibilities such as comets, a spotlight on cloud or reflection of the moon, or a meteor shower.

He said the timing was right for the SpaceX rocket to have travelled over the Atlantic Ocean, Africa and the Indian Ocean and be in skies over Australia at the time the spiralling light was seen.

The fact that it could be seen over such a broad area meant whatever caused the flare had to be very high in the atmosphere or in orbit above the Earth, Jacob added.

“All the information points to this SpaceX rocket,” he said.

The launch of the privately owned Falcon 9 test rocket marked a milestone for the space industry in the race to develop commercial carriers capable of ferrying cargo and astronauts to the orbiting International Space Station.

Click for video

***********

MUFON witness report: I saw a spiral in the sky @ 5.50am 5 June 2010 Brisbane. It was about the size of an orange and had a bright light at the centre and a spiral but it wasn’t spinning. It traveled across the sky and disappeared over the horizon after 2 min.

1. Where were you and what were you doing at the time?
We where in Munna Street Wilston Brisbane facing South about to head of for a bike ride.

2. What made you first notice the object?
Looking ahead you couldnt miss it. It was huge.

3. What did you reckon the object was when you first noticed it?
I have never seen anything like it before, it was mesmerizing, so much so I didnt even reckon to video it on my phone.

4. Describe the object and its actions and motions.
It had a very bright light in the centre and 5/6 clockwise spirals which travelled about 270 degrees around the center and faded off.

The spiral travelled from SSW 210, over our heads to 90 west and disappeared over the horizon.

The spiral did not rotate but went across the sky at speeds slightly slower than an aircraft.

As it approached the horizon in the west the shape changed as if we where looking at a spiral from behind, the spiral was more cone like in appearence.

It looked similar to the one in Norway but the spirals did not rotate around and around the center like that one.

The morning sky was still black and crystal clear. The moon was visable with no halo around it. Stars could also be seen.

5. Describe your feelings, reactions and actions, during and after sighting the object.
Just felt as if it was the coolest thing I had ever seen. And a bit of WTF!

6. How did you lose sight of the object?
It disappeared over the horizon.

Sorry images are average taken from a mobile phone, #1 is the original and #2 I tried to lighten.

***********

MUFON witness report: A police officer took these two photos from a mobile phone at 5:48am EST after observing an object travelling North East across the sky above North Brisbane, Australia. The object was described as having a bright centre with a spiral emanating from it. The source compared the object with the Norway sighting in December 2009 only the centre was brighter and more defined. The object was observed for about 5 minutes by more than one person before disappearing on the horizon.

NOTE: Why, all of a sudden, are there so many ’spiral’ UFO sightings…then later, we are told that these are merely man-made objects? These ‘explanations’ are becoming, IMO, a bit too convenient. Any thoughts? Lon

Australian Spiral UFO Sightings…Falcon 9 Rocket or Something Else?

Crop Circle Crop Circles Sacred geometry Alien Aliens UFO Sightings and Crop Circles – History of Alien Contact section 6 and 7 Crop Circles were the actual formations formed in Crops of Farmers across the world due to actual landings of space-ships of alien-races upon the crops of farmers across the world as this was, for such aliens with their space-ships quite comfortable, simple access into dire…