X News Now

“If Unidentified Flying Objects are indeed Extra-Terrestrial, and we are being visited by many different species…where are the capitalists?”

The future looks scary folks. The most vital like affair to ever be borne of humanity is in jeopardy. The one human construct which has lasted nearly as long as religion may be no more than a fleeting mote in the eye of God. The engine which has driven development, progression and greed on our world may not be in the future of any advanced race..Do you see any ETs selling flying cars?

I don’t know it. Didn’t ninety nine percent of the visionary science fiction writers weave a thousand worlds of enterprise, a universe teaming with capitalists? Foundation Trilogy, Cities in Flight, Dune. Television and the movies liked to sensationalize the topic of aliens. Early TV dealt with extremes in aliens. They were usually monsters or they turned out to be saints. Then came Star Trek, which was able to tap into the sense of wonderment and possibilities in the cosmos and nothing would be the same again. Alien, Star Wars and a thousand more spawned intelligent species which bartered in one way or the other. They even had their own greed. Later on, when special effects could catch up we could really see these alien cultures and their economic sides.

We all know too well what would happen if capitalism was the driving force behind these visits. We would have been roped, tagged, and over developed a long time ago. We would have been, for lack of a better word, absorbed. You can buy anything, even a world, with the right carrot.

But, none of these beings (there may be hundreds) have not tried to sell us one thing…not one! What could that mean for our future? No more going out to buy an IPhone? How can you show off your new antique Porsche? The fun of showing your friend your new 50 3D TV gone… what would we do with ourselves? We find it a fantastic deal of fun in buying a gadgets and although the enthusiasm objects fades we can always go on to something new. It can be argued capitalism helps channel competition in less harmful ways. Evolution place that competition in all of us as a driving force to survive so it needs an outlet!

So what could it mean if they are all non-capitalistic species? We know socialism seems to deaden creativity. When you end up working for the state it can be so uninspiring. Many fantastic thinkers have envisions of a utopian society where the higher self is the part of everyone’s life. A society where caring, respecting each other and the environment is not far from the thoughts of all. Everyone in this society is educated to the fullest. Everything is done for the betterment of society. What a world!

But, in the thousands of years of development of these lofty ideals the human species has nothing close to a Utopian society. Humans seem to cycle between advancement and the law of nature mentality.

What are some of the cons to Capitalism? Huge Business controls technology advancements they also choose when that technology will be released to maximize profits. You can bet your life that many a fantastic thought has been left on the drawing board because the company couldn’t patent whatever it was. Medicine also- do any of us really reckon a drug company would bring a new effective drug against disease to fruition without a commercial payday? So capitalism is far from perfect but it is the best of the alternatives we have. How could any species be able to end that driving force of nature without at least channeling it into the least destructive force, capitalism?

It doesn’t seem, at least in the human example of development, that there is no safe and effective alternative. When I started this post I didn’t have an answer. I knew that the more entrenched capitalism is in a society the more controlled that society is by capitalism. I knew that it wasn’t democracy that brought down the Soviet Union; it was capitalism. We see that now in Russia, which is not a bright example of democracy in action but is effectively using capitalism. But the answer was not new it just was never applied like this. There was a force which could change the very makeup of an entire species: Evolution.

Nature seems to adapt to the dangers around it and what greater danger than a species on the planet with an unending appetite and power to exercise that appetite whenever it wished? This danger has been increasing each year as the human species exercises its will. When will this end? Well, in capitalism system it’s not supposed to end. But, with nature any threat to the balance seems to be dealt with again and again especially where life is concerned. Some of us call that balancer the Creator.

We have to admit most of what we want now has nothing to do with need. We have to admit the ever expanding, consuming human species can’t go on indefinitely. There are limits to everything. We know some other fascinating facts about evolution. Sometimes it uses mutation to make leaps in development. The brain got larger and really smarter really quickly in evolutionary terms. But survival by any means was kept intact. The brain took a leap in intelligence but not in emotional development. Could this new leap in evolution change a species’ world view both intellectually and emotionally? Could it seal the rift? What would happen if the next step in human evolution gave us inner peace? What would happen if the next step gave all of us fantastic intelligence? Let’s also include the senses. What new senses would we become aware of? Could we really read not only another person’s mind but the person themselves? You wouldn’t need an IPhone- you would be one. Wouldn’t lying become a dead art? What would happen if our emotional reactions were no longer driven by survival because we knew we would? We would have achieved through evolution what humankind has dream of since the dawn of unjust pain and hardship: Utopia.

Did these alien species face their own possible downfalls? Did some of these alien cultures nearly disappear? Did nature step in to secure the future of life and of the predominate species? What would it be like to know who you are and what you wish to do from the very start? What would it be like to really know the other members of your species and I mean REALLY KNOW them? What would it be like to never need a substance to make you feel excellent? How about other addictions? Eating problems would disappear as the mind and body would work in unison. How about a body that not only tells you when you are sick but what is causing the sickness? What would be like to have silent in your conscious, no contradictions about yourself? What would it be like to act intelligently in all situations, not react?

This is what I reckon happens: Their choice machine is not like ours. They have truly evolved passed our type of survival. They have an emotional connection to their history which forever teaches them. The destroyer of worlds evolved past Conqueror to Shepherd, and life once again, finds a way.

These Clip: Star travel the dream starts” Society for Scientific Exploration Conference 2010.

Clips of UFOs that might just be more “phenomenon” and couldn’t be ours.

Thanks to Original news poster.

Five Earth Like Planets Found Circling Alien Sun HD 10180

Astronomers using ESO instruments have learned a remarkable extrasolar planetary system that has some striking similarities to our own Solar System. At least five planets are orbiting the Sun-like star HD 10180, and the regular pattern of their orbits is similar to that observed for our neighbouring planets. One of the new extrasolar worlds could be only 1.4 times the mass of the Earth, making it the least massive exoplanet ever found.

A senior astronomer has said that the hunt for alien life should take into account alien “sentient machines”.

Seti, the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, has until now sought radio signals from worlds like Earth.

But Seti astronomer Seth Shostak argues that the time between aliens developing radio technology and artificial intelligence (AI) would be small.

Writing in Acta Astronautica, he says that the odds favour detecting such alien AI rather than “biological” life.

Read on at news.bbc.co.uk.

to news maker

Note: Stans’ Equation and 2010 full presentation below(presentation for one week only).

As anyone who has follows me knows, I advocate for the UFO witness and their right to a honest hearing in the public eye. For those who don’t know Stan Romanek he is a modern era abduction tale. Heralded in a book called “Messages” as the most “documented abduction case” I went to bat for him against non-other than James Carrion X-International Director of MUFON’s on accusations of possible fraud.

James nefariously got hold of a document that Stan claimed was left in his mailbox by a dark government agency warning to stop public disclosure of what was happening to him. Stan claimed the document had been checked and was deemed authentic. Stan never publically released the document nor was it reproduced in his book.

James showed a constant spelling mistake on a certain word in this document could be traced directly to Stan’s lack of command of the English language. It seems that Stan also had written up reports by other UFO witnesses names and submitted them to MUFON and you guessed it…same spelling mistakes. I chose to go to the defense of Stan.. My reasoning was this. We know that the government has harassed people before when they have gone public so setting a person up with a powerful abduction report is not beyond ones imagination. John Keel in his book “The Mothman Prophases” documents how a journalist was harassed by what seemed to be government types “MIB” by reporting on the sightings around the Point Pleasant Virginia creature sightings. This has been proven to have happened. So many cases throughout the history of UFO experiences prove some agency is very interested in people who have these ongoing experiences or those who report them.

One of the element I relied on in this case was that it had been investigated by excellent boots on the ground MUFON investigators like Daniel Sims and Aleiandro Rojas. First let me say that there is very small doubt that Stan has had some real experiences. He has had genuine UFO sighting with other witnesses some with MUFON investigators themselves. The other side of the coin is he also sensationalized the case with Jeff Peckman on the Larry King show by releasing what was reported to be a gray alien peeking in his window which he videoed. This video at the time was laughed at by most of the public as nothing more than CGI or a puppet. Also there were some rumors that this was not the original video and claims went back and forth clouding the issue.

James’s article left me with one huge nagging question; why? Why didn’t the document get released and why didn’t the MUFON investigators catch this blatant spelling mistake. Stan’s book lack so much documentation that when I went to the “MUFON 2009 International Conference” I questioned him (he had a table) on the reasons behind this. His answer was the “Publisher” had control and that was the way they wanted it. It seems they were looking to do a DVD or something else.

Recently I received the new issue of “Open Minds” magazine which I consider a brilliant contribution to the UFO field. The issue theme covered the most documented ET abduction cases in UFO history. In the issue was a interview and a report on the Stan Romenak case by none other than Aleiandro Rojas . I have to say I read it with fantastic enthusiasm but came away somewhat disappointed. The controversial document was not covered at all in the issue. But the article had one of the equation he had written in his sleep. Stan had claimed a physicist had look at the equation and determined it was really regarding element 115 which hadn’t even been learned then. Stan claimed the aliens had told him they tried to give it to the government and they wouldn’t share it with the people so they gave it to Stan. Well I thought here was something I could check and I sent the equation to a sympathetic physicist I know. His integrity for me is unimpeachable he gave up a very lucrative business to devote himself to pure research and to teach. I will let him relate to you what he thought of the one page of equations. He reminded me of something very vital “mathematics is easily checked” and he welcomes anyone to check his conclusions themselves.

The equations presented to me of one page have some issues. In general, these equations are commonly used in electrodynamics, wave equations and gravitational studies; but, without even going into detail of the equivalences of lines one, two and three, there are some problems with the basic forms of things;

1. When using the approximated expansion term on the sixth line for “k” with the Laplacian operator of the first line, first term, it is equal to zero after performing the spherical coord scalar laplacian operation, it is odd to show a long equation with the first term equal to zero. It is also weird to show the first 2 terms of line 6, it is trivial to show “k” is the square of the square root, why do it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplacian



2. I assume the “k” here is the wavenumber, if not, and one uses “k” from the approximation, the unit are still incorrect. The fourth line is omega (I assume and not “double u”), the angular frequency, and if so, is not defined correctly. It should have dimensions equal to “2*pi/seconds”; however, the units are “2*pi/meters²” and are incorrect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_frequency

3. The seventh line is a modification for a “Gauss’s law” variant involving the displacement field vector “D”, in defining the total charge “Q”. This equation helps to find the field due to free charges with a spherical field distribution (how it is shown with 4*pi*(assumed to be r^2).This equation is found in most E&M books, but the units are not right. The “sigma²” should be “r²“, where r is the radial distance, not the surface charge density sigma. Here “k” is used as the dielectric constant, or the relative permittivity given by “epsilon/epsilon_0″.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_displacement_field

Directly below it a copy of Stan Equation please feel free to check them yourselves:

Do I reckon Stan had most of these experiences, yes I reckon he did. Do I reckon the Stan Romaneks’ documentation on his abduction part of his experience has some serious question, I’ll let you be the judge of that.

Thanks to Nicole of IUFOC for permission to show his full presentation.

Thanks to Original news poster.